PAYING ATTENTION!
by Tom Duggan

<<<<<Back to Archives!

Click the Little Devil
Return to Main Page


A Valid Case For the North Side Location

It is patently unfair to characterize people as bigots and racist simply because they believe the new high school should be located on the north side of the city. It’s also unfair to dismiss their position or questions because you have already made up your mind. While there are some people in Lawrence motivated by race, that small number of people do not reflect the majority of those fighting for the north side location.

The worst thing we can do is demonize people who disagree and dismiss their points of view. That creates division where we truly need inclusion. The function of government is to openly debate all the facts and issues and make a more informed choice. Both sides of this debate want what is best for the city. Both sides should respect the other and listen, yes listen, to the valid concerns of those who disagree. Out of fairness, I would like to present an objective and valid argument on behalf of those who legitimately believe that the high school should be built in North Lawrence:

Since 1950 the city of Lawrence has seen a mere 14% increase in new housing construction. That’s less than 1% per year. Think about that. With all the fires, burned out buildings, and vacant lots we have in Lawrence, our new housing construction has been non existent. This is destroying our tax base. It’s the main reason we have to rely on the state for our funding. While the rest of the country is seeing the biggest economic boom in U.S. history, Lawrence is still struggling to make ends meet. Abandoned business along the down town stretch have no hope for revitalization without an anchor to bring and keep people and money flowing through the center of the city. The high school could be that anchor.

Building on the north side would provide sports events, art exhibits, community theater presentations, and a prime location for promoting the City of Lawrence. This would attract people from all over the valley and, by it’s mere existence down town, would help dispel the negative image associated with the name “Lawrence”. It could be the down town showcase we have been dreaming about for the last 50 years.

That constant flow of people and money to the downtown districts of Lawrence would provide a safe campus environment which could also include a public safety police sub station, where police are on campus 24 hours a day to protect students and the surrounding neighborhood. Businesses in the area would see an immediate improvement in the value of their trade and property. A north location would put our all important focus back on rebuilding a burnt out, tax poor, north central district.

At the north side location, only 48 students are eligible for bussing. If the high school is built on the south side location, more than 1300 student would be bussed every single day. Besides the outrageous costs for mandatory transportation, how fair is it to these children that we force them to get up a earlier every morning? How fair is it to put them on a bus every day, and force them to arrive home a later? How fair is it to them? Are we even thinking of the quality of life issues that will effect these students?

The city will be saddled with millions of dollars in transportation costs that must be paid out of local taxes. That means after the first initial grants run out (within five years) your property taxes must be raised to continue paying for the enormous transportation costs of bussing over 1300 kids every single day from North Lawrence to South Lawrence. We have no choice. Remember too, that the state legislature is changing the formula for education reform money. Your tax money is guaranteed to increase so we can pay for bussing and education when that happens. Where is the money going to come from? What services will we cut to provide that transportation cost? We are in a great economy now and we’re struggling. What happens when this economy slows down? Where are we then?

There is no debating the fact that a north side high school would become the anchor that down town needs to help revitalize the city. The south side has nothing to revitalize. It is mainly residential, and includes the Stadium Projects, which is over run with drugs and violence. Let’s not forget the South Lawrence East School, with thousands of our youngest children, will be just a few feet away from the influence of high school students. Drugs and weapons are abundant in any urban high school. Do we really want that spilling over to our largest grammar school population simply because the location is convenient?

I agree that the Mayor’s plans for the north side were flimsy at first. But that becomes irrelevant to the discussion. The focus of this debate needs to be the ;long term best interest of the students attending, and the neighborhoods surrounding the chosen location. Nothing else. Patty Dowling’s stated quest for a north school location has a great deal of merit and I think people are dismissing it out of personal disgust for the way she has handled herself lately. That isn’t fair to the children and it certainly isn’t’ fair to the future of the city. Twenty years from now Patty Dowling’s politics will be just a memory, but the high school will still be here effecting our lives.

The neighborhoods directly and indirectly surrounding the South Lawrence site will present a multitude of traffic and safety problems. That area is already one of the most congested traffic areas in the city. It’s the gateway from routes 495, 125, and North Andover. Try driving by the Showcase Cinema on a Friday night when the movies are letting out. Now imagine 100 times that number of people on any afternoon congesting that bottlenecked area, every day, five days a week, during weekend ball games, and even after school events.

Then there’s the issue of the flood plane. No one has talked about it yet, so I guess that means I have to. In 1987 Lawrence received millions of Federal dollars because of the April 1st flood. Water engulfed the entire area of the Stadium, flooding out Demoulas, and closing down route 114 for days. When the Shawsheen river overflows it floods out everything from the Hampton Inn and Friendly’s, all the way to Osgood street and Mass Avenue. That includes the area of the south Lawrence East and the site where the high would be built.

I worked for DPW director Frank Johnson during the 1987 flood. I was sent up in a helicopter to take video footage of the damage that was done by the flood. It is amazing footage! The destruction done to that area occurred without a multi million dollar high school sitting directly in it’s path. This is a disaster that can be avoided. We have to think about tomorrow and plan for every contingency. I will make copies of the video available to anyone who wants to see it. (This is why the mayor should talk to me more often.)

Every 20 to 30 years a flood of the magnitude of 1987 occurs on the Shawsheen River. That means we are due for another within the first 15 years of a new school being built. Why are we not thinking long term? How outraged will the tax payers be when we announce ten years from now that we have to raise taxes to repair 10 million dollars worth of flood damage to a new high school? The Federal government will not pay for damage caused by a flood if we knowingly build a high school on the edge of the most dangerous area of a 20 year flood plane.

Sure there are positive reasons to have the school in South Lawrence. There are positive reasons for both sites, and of course negative reasons for both as well. But, let’s open our minds a little instead of taking a position and then looking for facts to support that position. Let’s ask questions and hear the concerns of people on both sides of this debate. This is not a decision to be entered into lightly or quickly, no matter who is right or who benefits. I‘m not crazy about the way Mayor Dowling presented this to the public, but I am also open minded enough to listen to her legitimate thoughts on the plan. No politician is always wrong. Her behavior as of late has caused some to advocate the south side out of spite, anger, political posturing and even a little reverse racism. This does not help the city prosper. Isn’t that our ultimate goal? We need to be open and refrain from saying that we support either site without having some real concrete answers to some very rational questions.

I would have no problem with the high school sitting on either site if the concerns of the people on each side of the debate were being considered and respected so that we have the best site and the best high school. But that’s not what is happening. Cries of racism, bigotry, and lack of communication are silencing the minority of people who want a north school location. The voice of the minority should be heard and respected. Any councilor who supports the high school on the south side without having the answers to all the questions are not doing their jobs. They are using convenient facts to support their opinions and ignoring facts which cast their position into doubt.

Please, do not advocate for either site without having all the facts. Ask questions and evaluate both sites. Look at which is best for everyone involved, and then make a decision. And remember, don’t base your opinions solely on the information you get from the daily paper. Read Rumbo, listen to the radio, call your city councilors, watch the meetings! and listen to the answers to everyone’s questions! Especially those who disagree with you. When you do that, you might just conclude that a north site location is better for Lawrence. And if you don’t, that’s OK too. It never hurts to be better informed before you make a decision. There are a lot of options. Let’s take a look at all of them before we leap. Let’s learn something from the Emerson College fiasco. Doing something this large out of haste and political expedience only causes long term problems for future generations.

So now I ask you, my readers, if the Mayor and this administration can step up to the plate long enough to plan a legitimate site in North Lawrence, without taking churches, and without demolishing landmarks, would you be willing to consider all the information before making a final decision? Would you put side your personal preferences right now and look at all the facts on both sides? Are you willing to do that for our children and their children? We are the masters of our own destiny here. We will rise or fall tomorrow based on the decisions we make today. Don’t the children of tomorrow deserve a little more consideration than this?